Will Boris Johnson Compromise UK Food Standards for a Post-Brexit Trade Deal with Trump?
As the discussion around a potential trade deal between the UK and the US post-Brexit intensifies, there are growing concerns that the UK could compromise its stringent food and animal welfare standards to secure this agreement. This article explores the likelihood of such a compromise and the potential impact on UK food products and British consumers.
US Food Standards and UK Food Standards
The UK has historically adhered to rigorous food safety and animal welfare standards, which are often referred to as EU food standards. However, to do business with the US, these standards would need to be significantly relaxed. This would mean allowing lower quality meat, poultry, and other agricultural products into the UK market.
President Biden's administration has already signaled opposition to this, citing concerns over the impact on the Good Friday Agreement. Nonetheless, if Boris Johnson pushes through this compromise, the consequences could be severe for both the UK and its consumers.
The Impact on British Consumers and Local Producers
British consumers are known for their loyalty to local produce and British food products. If the UK were to lower its standards to align with US counterparts, it is likely that many consumers would boycott imported US products in favor of locally produced goods. This could lead to a significant impact on import companies, causing many to go bankrupt within a short period.
Political Climate and Public Opinion
The political climate in the UK is a critical factor here. Boris Johnson's willingness to make compromises to secure a trade deal could be seen as unwise or even treasonous by many voters. There is strong public support for maintaining the UK's current high standards, especially in terms of animal welfare.
Political Pressure and Backlash
With no written regulations to enforce food quality standards post-Brexit, the pressure to adhere to EU standards would be significantly reduced. Starting from January 1, 2021, the UK government would face immense pressure to abandon these standards and allow for a freer trade environment with the US.
Political narratives have already been deployed to soften public opinion, with messaging around the safety and quality of chlorinated chicken. However, such misdirection tactics are unlikely to succeed in the long term. The public is increasingly aware of the potential compromises and may rally against such measures.
Alternatives and Future Outlook
Some have suggested that the UK should demand that the EU follow UK food standards instead, arguing that UK standards are often more stringent. While this is a valid point, the EU has historically been more relaxed in some areas. Navigating this complex relationship post-Brexit will be a significant challenge.
Johnson's push to conclude a trade deal before the end of the year could be seen as a knee-jerk reaction to potential shortages if no deal is reached with the EU. However, this timing and strategy seem questionable, given Johnson's track record and the potential for a backlash from both domestic and international stakeholders.
Ultimately, the decision to compromise on UK food standards for a trade deal will hinge on a range of factors, including public opinion, political pressure, and the ultimate goal of securing a favorable trade agreement with the US.