Why in July 2019 Did Tulsi Gabbard Call for Americans to Fight Back?
In July 2019, Tulsi Gabbard, the Hawaiian congresswoman and former Democratic presidential candidate, penned a scathing opinion piece in The Huffington Post. In this critical analysis, she discussed her disillusionment with the increasingly prevalent online censorship and lack of free speech.
Gabbard, a progressive politician, wasn't alone in this sentiment. The 2016 elections saw a profound divide among progressives, with many turning their criticism inward just as fervently as they did towards conservatives. This internal conflict was further exacerbated by the alleged manipulation of data and news feeds by platforms like Facebook, a scandal that garnered significant public attention. However, Gabbard's stance wasn't just about these events of 2016; it was a broader critique of the digital surveillance and control exerted by tech giants.
The backdrop of Gabbard's frustration lies in the power these tech companies wield over what individuals see, hear, and find as a result of online searches. This control isn't just about content moderation; it's about the ability to shape public opinion, suppress certain narratives, and track user behavior to sell their products and services more effectively.
The Control Over Online Spaces
These platform giants, particularly Google, have a significant influence over what information is readily available to the public. Google's algorithms not only dictate which search results appear on the first page but also heavily impact the visibility of any given piece of content. As a result, the top search results can often overshadow alternative viewpoints or sources. This power to shape public perception has far-reaching consequences, from political participation to the formation of beliefs on social issues.
Furthermore, tech companies like Google and Facebook gather vast amounts of data on their users. This surveillance is not only invasive but also raises ethical concerns about privacy. Gabbard highlighted this by mentioning how these companies track users' every move online, extending their influence beyond just search results.
The Unpersoning of Progressives
Gabbard went on to illustrate the chilling reality of how these tech companies can be used as tools to silence voices that don't align with their corporate interests. The term "unpersoning" is particularly poignant, as it evokes an eerie parallel to historical practices of oppression, where individuals are erased from existence.
A key example of this was Google's decision to discredit Gabbard, akin to the way an "Old Bolshevik" might be marginalized in Soviet history. The absence or minimization of progressive voices on search results can effectively marginalize them, making it more difficult for their ideas and contributions to gain traction in the public discourse.
Finding Strength and Advocacy
Gabbard's courage in calling out the injustices of online censorship is commendable. She recognized the need to fight back against those who leverage their digital dominance to control information and suppress dissenting voices. This fight is not only about preserving individual liberties but also about safeguarding the integrity of democratic processes.
The control over information and online freedom is a paramount issue that requires vigilance and activism. Guggard's stance serves as a rallying cry for anyone concerned about these issues. It's not just about one person or party; it's about standing up for the principles of transparency, truth, and freedom of expression.
Conclusion
Tulsi Gabbard's 2019 call for Americans to fight back against the control exerted by platforms like Google underscores a greater battle for online freedom and transparency. As we navigate the complex world of digital communications, it's crucial to remain vigilant and push for a more open and equitable online environment. The issues Gabbard highlighted are not merely political but fundamental to the health of our society as a whole.