Why Trump’s Move in Syria Betrayed the Kurds: A Closer Look at Dishonest Alliances

Donald Trump, a man known for his ruthless business tactics and opportunistic nature, has once again proven this character by betraying his Kurdish allies in Syria. The decision to withdraw U.S. troops and allow Turkey to invade West Kurdistan/Syrian Kurdistan was a calculated move driven by Trump's desire to end U.S. involvement in the ongoing conflict. This article delves into the factors behind this decision and the consequences for the Kurds.

The Legacy of Dishonest Alliances

Trump’s reputation for betraying those he deems unhelpful or no longer valuable is well-documented. This pattern of behavior extends to his dealings with allies, as evidenced by his decision to abandon the Kurds. In a statement that underscores this trend, Trump has been likened to a businessman who would betray anyone to further his own interests. He is said to have no qualms about violating agreements, disregarding moral obligations, and exploiting people to serve his purposes.

A Complex and Complicated Decision

The reasoning behind Trump’s move to withdraw U.S. troops and allow the Turkish invasion is multifaceted. The Syrian Kurds, despite being a crucial ally in the fight against ISIS, were ultimately deemed expendable. The U.S. brand called ISIS had been bombing innocent Turkish civilians, and neither the Syrian government nor the U.S.-backed YPG (People's Protection Units) had the means to effectively stop the encroachment of ISIS into Turkey. The Turkish intervention, aimed at establishing an unmanned corridor to provide safety for 5 million Syrian refugees in Turkey, was justified by Trump as a means to balance these conflicting interests.

The Roots of the Conflict

The birth of ISIS in Iraq “????” is often attributed to the outcomes of the U.S. invasion in 2003, which was built on false claims, including the non-existent mass destruction weapons. This invasion, which caused the death of 2 million Iraqi civilians, facilitated the emergence of ISIS in the torture camps that were established. The U.S.’s involvement in these camps and the broader conflict has been cited as a key factor in the rise of such extremist groups.

The Exploitation and Use of Middle Eastern Allies

Further complicating the narrative is the historical pattern of exploiting Middle Eastern allies. The author notes that more than 10 Arabian dynasties revolted against the Ottomans during World War I, manipulated by British agents for their own gain. The establishment of Saudi Arabia as a kingdom by the UK and the treatment of other dynasties as tools further illustrates the pattern of using and abandoning Middle Eastern allies. The author argues that the relationship between the U.S. and the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) follows this same tradition, with the Kurds serving as cannon fodder for Western interests.

The Consequences for the Kurds

The withdrawal of U.S. troops and the subsequent Turkish invasion have had catastrophic consequences for the Kurds. The Yazidis and other Kurdish populations in the region have faced severe persecution and have lost countless lives. The historical and geographical context, marked by Western interference and manipulation, highlights the vulnerability of these groups. The author suggests that the burden of this exploitation and use falls on the Kurds, who have been willing participants in these complex geopolitical games.

Given the ongoing conflict and the volatile situation in the region, it is imperative to continue monitoring the developments and their impact on the Kurdish population. Understanding the historical and geopolitical context is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect and support the Kurds.

Conclusion

The decision to betray the Kurds should serve as a stark reminder of the complex and often exploitative nature of international relations. While the immediate consequences of this decision are devastating, it is essential to advocate for the protection and rights of all marginalized groups, particularly in a region marked by historical and ongoing conflicts.