Why Perception Matters: PM Modi and the Arguments Against Silence on Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya
Amidst the ongoing debate over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the cases involving Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya, it is important to dissect the perspectives and historical context surrounding these high-profile figures in Indian politics and the legal system.
Government Actions and Legal Measures
The assertion that Prime Minister Modi is silent on such matters is a common refrain, but a closer look reveals that the government has taken significant action. For instance, the government has moved the UK court for the extradition of Vijay Mallya. Furthermore, the recently passed ordinance aims to confiscate the properties of both individuals and realize any potential funds, a move that Sonia Gandhi’s UPA government could have done earlier.
Historical Context and Government Actions
The issues involving these individuals began during different administrations. Nirav Modi's case started in 2011, and the first issuance of unsecured loan occurred after Rahul Gandhi, the Congress party leader, addressed his jewellery fashion show as the chief guest in Delhi. This historical context is crucial in understanding the timeline and the political landscape during those times.
Similarly, the case involving Vijay Mallya began in 2009, and the Manmohan Singh government did not arrest Mallya despite his failure to repay the loan. Instead, they chose to extend further loan sanctions through the financial ministry.
Citizenship and Rationality
The argument that citizens lack logic and rationality is a common refrain. However, it is not just a matter of perceived lack of rationality but also of being easily swayed by propaganda and rumors. The Congress party, particularly leaders like Pappuji, has successfully employed propaganda to frame the blame on Prime Minister Modi and his administration, thereby misinforming the public.
It is important for the Indian populace to develop a more rational approach to issues, judiciously evaluating the information presented to them. The ability to discern fact from fiction is essential in guiding informed public opinion and supporting a more transparent and accountable governance system. Only then can citizens expect the government to act with the same level of efficiency and transparency as sought in high-profile cases.
Conclusion
Discussing the administrative actions and historical context helps to provide a clearer picture of the government's stance and the evolution of these cases over time. It's crucial to recognize that the current administration, like any other, has taken steps towards addressing these issues and that the silences or perceived inactions can be linked to specific political and legal complexities. As India progresses, fostering a more rational and discerning citizenship is key to achieving a more just and accountable society.