Why Hollywood Stays Liberal Despite Real-World Discontent

There is a common question floating around about why Hollywood is so liberal. The response is often met with a combination of surprise and skepticism by those who observe the state of society and politics in other regions like Europe. The perception is that elites, particularly in Hollywood, seem to prioritize progressive causes above the well-being of ordinary working people.

Elites and the Disconnection

Many argue that elites, especially in Hollywood, pay little attention to the struggles of the common worker. If they did, they would support traditional structures like nuclear families, rather than pushing for changes that they themselves may not fully understand or experience. For instance, the idea that a family should consist of a father and a mother, and the dismissal of gender studies and feminism, indicate a stark difference in values between the elites and the broader population.

The political landscape, particularly in the recent 2024 elections, has shown a shift. The so-called 'woke agenda' has led to the creation of a toxic culture. Many individuals associated with the left, including those in media and politics, have been seen as fanatic and disconnected from real-world realities. Their reactions and the language they use often target those who do not share their views, particularly middle and lower-income groups. This divide is not new, but it is now more pronounced and in the spotlight.

The End of the Studio System and New Directions

The shift in Hollywood can be traced back to the end of the studio system. This change marked the emergence of a new generation of actors, writers, directors, and producers who wanted to create films that reflected the social and cultural realities of the 1960s and 1970s. These trends eventually morphed into a series of trendy causes and the assumption that these views reflected the majority opinion.

However, this assumption is flawed. Many of the most vocal proponents of progressive ideologies might also be the least exposed to the actual consequences of their ideals. Take, for example, the 2015 refugee crisis in Germany. It was the more left-leaning individuals, often from media and education sectors, who were most vocal. These individuals likely lived in areas with upper-middle-class neighbors and had limited, if any, direct contact with refugees. Conversely, the areas where refugees were placed were in working-class neighborhoods, where the impact of cultural and economic changes was more direct.

The Consequences of Ideological Disconnect

The disconnect between the educated, wealthy elite and the working class is evident in various aspects of life. For instance, when higher education and income groups advocate for green footprints or favoring fair-trade goods, it is often less a matter of necessity and more a matter of preference. These individuals can afford to pay extra for these items without a significant impact on their financial stability. However, for those who live paycheck to paycheck, such costs can be a considerable burden.

This ideological divide extends to social issues. The left's focus on social peculiarities, such as inventing new genders and pronouns, is often perceived as trivial by those who face more pressing economic and social challenges. In a society where financial survival is a daily struggle, discussing gender and social issues may seem like a luxury that the poor cannot afford.

The Woke Agenda and Its Impact

The woke agenda often results in the ostracization of those who do not conform to its standards. After the recent elections, MSNBC and other left-leaning channels have frequently featured reactions that are aggressive and dismissive of those who do not share the woke perspective. This mentality has led to a situation where people are labeled as "stupid" or "bored" if they do not participate in these progressive causes.

My belief is that this ideological divide is not just about political stance but also about real-life experiences. The wealthy and educated often live in a protective bubble, while the working class must navigate the harsh realities of daily life. This gap in understanding and experience is what fuels the disconnect and, consequently, the perceived liberalism of Hollywood.

However, it is essential to recognize that the ideological divide does not exist within a vacuum. Both sides contribute to and experience the consequences of their beliefs. The liberal elite may not understand the real-world struggles, but the working class often does not appreciate the privilege and ignorance that can come from living in a bubble.

Conclusion

In summary, the liberal stance of Hollywood can be attributed to a combination of political and social factors. The disconnect between the elite and the working class, as well as the real-life consequences of progressive ideologies, contribute to the perceived liberalism in the entertainment industry. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for fostering a more inclusive and informed society.