Why Do We Accept the Term AAPtard?

It's intriguing to observe how many supporters of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) proudly embrace the term AAPtard. The usage of this label by opponents and critics, including Subramanian Swamy, was intended to create a divide among individuals and families, suggesting that supporting AAP makes one a 'retard' regardless of their qualifications, achievements, or familial relationships.

Background of AAPtard

AAPtard was initially coined and promoted by those opposed to the AAP, meant to demean and divide. However, many AAP supporters have adopted this term themselves, turning it into a badge of honor, essentially negating its derogatory intent. This phenomenon is not unique to AAPtard but can be seen in other contexts where identity and community can reframe harmful labels.

Historical Analogy: The N-Word

Consider the historical analogy of the N-word in the United States. This derogatory term was originally created by slave owners to demean African Americans. However, after the Civil Rights movement, many African Americans reclaimed the term, using it as a symbol of resistance and acceptance among their own community. The usage within the group trivialized the term's derogatory impact, much like how many AAP supporters accept and use the term AAPtard.

Trivialization and Community Identity

AAP supporters, like Rahul Dev Balagopal, who proudly uses the term in their bio, recognize the power of language in identity formation. By accepting and using the term, they blunt the hurt that detractors might inflict. If someone from another political party uses the term AAPtard against an AAP supporter, it often provokes a defensive or even angry response. In contrast, within the AAP community, the use of AAPtard is seen as a mark of support and pride.

Online Moderation and Community Guidelines

Online platforms like Quora have mechanisms to address the misuse of such terms. Moderators have established guidelines where offending terms, when used unsparingly, are considered insults. AAP supporters, such as Rohit Nigam, actively report misuse of AAPtard to maintain a respectful and constructive conversation environment. This reflects a broader understanding that while the term may not please all, its usage by self-identified supporters is accepted and appreciated within the community.

Acceptance and Reclaiming Derogatory Terms

The acceptance of AAPtard, much like the historical use of the N-word, serves as a powerful example of how marginalized groups and communities can reclaim and transform derogatory terms. It highlights the ability of communities to recontextualize harmful language and use it as a symbol of strength and unity.

Conclusion

While many may discomforted by the term AAPtard, its usage by supporters themselves can be seen as a form of reclaiming and redefining language within their group. This approach can help mitigate the divisiveness intended by its creators and foster a more inclusive and resilient online community.