Why Are Conservatives Afraid of Big Government but Not Big Corporations?
Introduction
The fear of big government among conservatives is a well-known and often debated topic. While conservatives express caution and mistrust towards the expansion of government power, they seem less alarmist about the influence of big corporations. This article delves into the reasons behind this differing perspective, examines the actions and impacts of both entities, and explores the attitudes and principles that shape these views.
Government vs. Corporations: A Comparison
It is often argued that government interventions can lead to the confiscation of property such as homes, the violation of personal freedoms, and the imposition of taxes. For example, big government has forcibly taken people's homes, marched into hurricane zones to disarm law-abiding citizens, and coerced individuals into paying for unwanted services, such as abortions. On the other hand, big corporations have built homes, created jobs, and contributed to the economy in a much less invasive manner.
One might argue, 'But government builds roads!' While it is true that some roads are indeed constructed by government entities, the majority of road infrastructure in the country is built by private companies. When the government decides to fund the construction of a road, it chooses a contractor, thereby supporting the private sector. If the government did not exist, it is plausible that companies would still build roads and other infrastructure to meet market demand.
Role of Government and Corporations
Conservatives advocate for a government with clear and limited functions, such as ensuring law and order, maintaining court systems, and defending the nation. Beyond these essential roles, they argue that government should not become larger without significantly reducing freedoms. Unfortunately, today's government has indeed grown in size and scope, leading to a reduction in individual freedoms.
In contrast, corporations operate within a more defined framework. They are driven by the need to serve the public and generate profits. Their ability to exert force and influence is limited by market forces and regulatory constraints. Unlike government, corporations cannot simply mandate behavior or seize property without facing significant consequences.
Attitudes Towards Big Corporations
Many conservatives recognize that big corporations can also be part of the problem. For instance, corporations might not align with the conservative agenda and can make decisions that are detrimental to their stakeholders. Additionally, big corporations can lobby for favorable tax treatments and regulatory easements, raising concerns among conservatives about their influence.
Conservatives can choose to boycott products from companies that do not align with their values. They can use their consumer power to signal disapproval. In contrast, the alternative to a government is not a choice but a necessity. One must inevitably pay taxes, making the government more compelling as a focal point of concern.
Conclusion
It is clear that while both government and big corporations can have a significant impact on society, conservatives have valid reasons to be more wary of government power. Government actions often carry the weight of mandatory compliance and have the potential to infringe upon individual freedoms in ways that corporations do not. The complex interplay between government and corporations requires a balanced approach where both are held accountable to their respective roles.