What Happens if the Mueller Investigation Yields No Evidence of Russian Collusion but Unearths Financial Crimes?
The Mueller investigation, which originally focused on Russian collusion during the 2016 presidential election, has taken an interesting turn. With no concrete evidence of Russian collusion, the spotlight now rests on potential financial crimes, leaving many questions unanswered and much to consider. This article explores the implications of such a scenario and sheds light on the intricacies of the Mueller probe.
Established Collusion and Trump's Disavowal
James Feigenbaum's notes have highlighted that collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign has been well-established. The probe is now turning its attention to a different aspect: the involvement of the White House in financial crimes. While Donald Trump has repeatedly denied any ties to Russian interference, he has also hinted that his son, Eric Trump, might have more information on financial dealings. Michael Flynn's former deputy, Gregory Stone, is now a subject of concern.
Money Laundering Allegations
Greg Larson's comments emphasize the rising suspicion that money laundering, particularly involving the Russians, may be at play. Historically, such practices were largely frowned upon, yet the Trump administration's involvement is now becoming a major focus of the investigation. Regardless of any potential pardons, tweets, or presidential library, legal consequences are inevitable. In fact, Trump has long felt that he would face significant financial fines, as noted by his own predictions. It's a testament to the political system's failure to prevent such activities from reaching the highest levels.
Reaching the US Attorney's Office
Collected evidence from the Mueller investigation will likely be referred to the US Attorney's office in the relevant jurisdiction. If local or state authorities find a more appropriate charge or are the last remaining legal authority due to Trump's various actions (like firing nearly everyone but the cleaning staff), they will be notified. This move underscores the complexity and breadth of the investigation, as it may span multiple jurisdictions and legal authorities. The implications of this referral process are significant, especially given Trump's past aggressive actions.
Crimes Are Crimes, Yet Political Context Is Not Ignored
It's important to note that crimes, regardless of political implications, will face legal consequences. Even in the case of the Whitewater investigation, Ken Starr shifted focus to other criminal activities once Whitewater was no longer a viable charge. Similarly, the focus of the Mueller investigation will be on whatever evidence is uncovered. Trump's hopes for a favorable outcome hinge on the conclusion that he was unaware of the collusion happening around him. However, in light of the ongoing financial investigations, this scenario becomes increasingly unlikely.
Duration and Complexity of the Investigation
Giuliani's statements regarding the timing of the investigation are sometimes misleading. Mueller is under no obligation to conclude his investigation soon. The duration of the probe is justified by the complex nature of the case. Just as the Whitewater investigation took nearly seven years, the Mueller investigation allows for thorough examinations of multiple threads of evidence. This includes any potential for obstruction of justice, campaign finance violations, and other criminal activities.
Conclusion and Reflections
The Mueller investigation, be it a dead end or a revelation, will have long-lasting implications. The focus on disenfranchised truths and financial crimes underscores the need for a more robust legal framework to prevent similar situations in the future. The political system's failure to keep out bad actors has led to a complex web of legal and ethical dilemmas. As the investigation continues, public and political scrutiny will intensify, further shaping the narrative and the future of American politics.