The USA's Struggle: Why Does the USA Want Pakistan to Do More?
It is often misunderstood that the United States of America (USA) is merely asking Pakistan to do more against their national interests. In reality, the relationship between the USA and Pakistan is complex and multifaceted, driven by mutual strategic interests. The 'do more' that the United States has continuously requested from Pakistan is grounded in a long-term commitment to regional security and stability.
Historical Context and Relations
The 'do more' from the USA to Pakistan is a 16-year-old request, reflecting an ongoing need for Pakistan to bolster its role in regional security. During this period, the relationship has fluctuated from good to strained. Notable years of tension include 2011, which was one of the worst periods, but even then, the relationship endured and strengthened in 2014 and 2015. This resilience speaks to the fundamental desire for cooperation, despite occasional setbacks.
The discord is often rooted in differing perceptions of national interests. Pakistan's concerns about Afghanistan, particularly regarding territorial disputes, have hindered the extent to which it can align with US requests. The USA, on the other hand, has consistently sought Pakistan's support in strategic areas like combating the Haqqani network and other terrorist groups that threatens US interests in the region.
Regional Security Concerns
One of the primary reasons the USA desires Pakistan to 'do more' is the presence and actions of the Haqqani network, a jihadist organization formed in Afghanistan with the initial aim of fighting Russian forces and later focusing on promoting a "jihad." The network has been implicated in numerous kidnappings, bombings, and killings targeting US military and civilian personnel. Their aim is to fight US and NATO forces and establish a strict Islamic state based on Sharia law.
Similarly, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, both of which have harmed US interests in Afghanistan and Pakistan, are another focal point. The USA seeks Pakistan's support in containing these groups, recognizing the importance of a stable and peaceful Afghanistan for regional stability.
National Interests and Diplomatic Failures
The breakdown in the relationship often stems from failed diplomacy. On the American side, there has been a consistent failure to offer viable solutions that align with Pakistan's national interests. For instance, the lack of a concrete plan for what would follow the departure of US forces from Afghanistan without creating a vacuum that destabilizes the region. This absence of strategic foresight has complicated the relationship and made it difficult for Pakistan to align with every US request.
On the Pakistani side, skepticism about the durability of any US presence post-2014 has fueled non-cooperation. Pakistan's leadership views the persistence of the Taliban and Haqqani elements as a necessary evil to maintain stability. The concern is that increased cooperation could lead to unforeseen backlash, similar historical precedents where the USA left after achieving its strategic objectives, leaving Pakistan in a precarious position.
Conclusion
Unless there is strong and sustained communication, the USA's attempts to 'do more' and Pakistan's resistance to it reflect a clash between strategic interests and national priorities. The USA's request for increased cooperation is driven by a desire for regional stability, which often aligns with US interests. Meanwhile, Pakistan's national interests necessitate a cautious and measured approach to foreign alliances.
Therefore, the 'do more' request from the USA to Pakistan is not a zero-sum game. It is a complex interplay of mutual needs and counter-balancing national interests that will continue to shape the future of both nations' relations.