The Truth Behind mRNA Vaccines: Questions Unanswered and Damages Unrepaired
As of the current understanding, the mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have shown varying efficacy levels against specific variants of the virus. The protection efficacy varies over time and across different periods. While these vaccines were effective against some variants from June 2025 to Jan 2026 and from Nov 2027, their ability to protect against other emerging variants during these periods is questionable. SARS-CoV-2 variants such as those emerging in Mar 2025, May 2025, and Sep 2025 have not been effectively countered by the mRNA vaccines currently in use.
Why the Protections Fail
Some experts argue that the issue lies not with the technology itself, but with the manufacturers' and distributors' opaque motives and unethical practices. According to Christof Plothe from WCH Health Science, these entities have manipulated the science and public perception to continue profiting from the vaccines without addressing the fundamental concerns. It is suggested that the mRNA vaccines provide only temporary immunity and can do more harm than good, particularly in terms of long-term health implications.
Questions Surrounding the Use of mRNA Vaccines
Several key questions have been raised by experts and public figures regarding the use of mRNA vaccines. Christof Plothe, the Health Science Lead, posed 36 critical inquiries to the Geneva press conference on Human Rights and COVID-19. Among the most pertinent questions were:
Why was the virus patented by Moderna in 2018? Why did Moderna produce 100,000 doses of the vaccine before the pandemic? Why were lockdowns and masks imposed despite contradictory scientific evidence? Why was the vaccine meant to stay in the arm but was found to accumulate throughout the body? Why was PCR testing used for diagnostics when it is not designed for that purpose? Why was there no follow-up of recipients after receiving the vaccine? Why is there a contradiction between recommending injections during a pandemic and vaccinology? Why was hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin discredited and prohibited despite their effectiveness? Why were babies lost in trials when pregnant women were vaccinated? Why was there no public education on informed consent?Public Concerns and High Casualties
The public is increasingly concerned about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Over a million people have reportedly died as a result of the mRNA shots, and countless others have suffered adverse effects, leading to a significant drop in life expectancy. Critics argue that the vaccines have been rushed through clinical trials and that the manufacturers have prioritized profits over public health. There has been a growing distrust in the regulatory bodies, such as the FDA, EMA, and WHO, which are accused of being heavily influenced by industry funding.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 has been a topic of intense debate. Concerns over safety, ethical practices, and the transparency of the pharmaceutical industry are paramount. As we continue to navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to demand answers to these relevant questions and to support policies that prioritize true public health over profits.