The Reality Behind Inclusive Language in Modern Politics
Recently, there has been a surge in discussion around the change in terminology within certain political circles. Specifically, the debate revolves around the usage of the term "birthing person" instead of "pregnant woman." This article aims to explore the context behind the adoption of such language, its broader implications, and why it is important to ensure inclusivity in political rhetoric.
Introduction to the Debate
The assertion that liberals are seeking to replace the term "pregnant woman" with "birthing person" is often portrayed as a conspiracy theory or an attempt to distract from more pressing issues. However, it is crucial to unpack this notion and understand its roots within modern discourse.
Why Conservatives Are Concerned
Conservatives often express concern over the growing influence of progressive political movements. The fear is that these movements are trying to assert control over language and social norms. However, it is important to recognize that the desire for inclusivity is not a one-way street. Both liberals and conservative individuals can make positive contributions to the discourse. Restrictions on free speech and the exclusion of marginalized groups are apparent in many conservative policies, which can be seen as a form of "liberal derangement syndrome" from a progressive perspective.
Inclusive Language and LGBTQ Rights
The debate over language use is closely tied to the struggle for LGBTQ rights. Terms like "birthing person" and "pregnancy," rather than "pregnant woman," are used to accommodate the diversity of gender identities and experiences. For instance, trans men who can become pregnant are identified as birthing persons. This language change aims to respect and include all identities, thereby fostering a more welcoming and inclusive environment.
Why "Birthing Person" Matters
The term "birthing person" is inclusive and covers a wide range of individuals who give birth, including women, nonbinary individuals, trans men, and intersex people. This approach ensures that the language used in political and social discourse acknowledges the diversity of human experiences. The term "pregnant woman," while commonly used, excludes those who do not identify as women or who do not fit the traditional gender binary.
Examples of Language Change
LGBTQ activists and many progressive politicians advocate for such language changes to promote inclusivity. For instance, when discussing pregnancy, the term "pregnant woman" might be used. However, when making general statements, "birthing person" is a more inclusive alternative. This term is also more respectful and avoids reinforcing harmful stereotypes about gender.
Reactions to Inclusivity Efforts
Some individuals, often labeled as "liberals," have faced criticism for these attempts to change language. Ana Kasparian, a "progressive" political commentator, is an example of someone who has pushed back against this inclusivity. Her sharp criticism, while understandable in her context, can be seen as counterproductive. Such reactions can undermine the broader movement towards inclusivity and rights for marginalized groups.
Conclusion
The debate over inclusive language reflects a broader struggle for justice and inclusion. Efforts to change terminology in political and social discourse aim to be more respectful and accommodating of diverse identities. It is crucial to engage in constructive dialogue and avoid unnecessarily polarizing language that can harm the very cause it seeks to support.
Endnotes:
[1] Rhatul Hasan, "I don't even know any liberals who are trying to replace the term 'pregnant woman' with 'birthing person' in general statements," Twitter, March 1, 2023.