The Infeasibility of the Gold Standard in Modern Economics

The Infeasibility of the Gold Standard in Modern Economics

The concept of gold as a standard for currency has been a cornerstone of economic theory, but today, it is widely regarded as impractical and ineffective. This article explores the reasons why the gold standard is not a viable option in current economic conditions.

Why the Gold Standard is Not Viable

The imposition of gold as a standard currency would fundamentally limit a country's monetary policy. Holding currency value directly to gold would make it impossible for central banks to manipulate currency values to their advantage. Given the current level of central bank influence over governments, a return to the gold standard is unlikely to be considered.

Limited Gold Supply and Economic Inefficiencies

The fundamental challenge with the gold standard is the limited supply of gold. The current global stock of gold is insufficient to back the vast amount of currency in circulation. Even if all the gold ever mined were to be recovered, including gold incorporated into jewelry, the supply would still be far too modest to meet the world's money supply needs.

Estimates suggest that the world's money supply, ranging from $62 trillions to $12 quadrillion, would require a significantly higher gold price to ensure its adequacy. For instance, at the lower end estimation, the price of gold would have to be 105,000 per ounce. Even if this were possible, the world's GDP grows at an average of 3% annually, while the supply of gold only increases by 1.5%. Such a scenario would perpetually keep the world in a recessionary state.

Historical Context and Failed Money Supplies

Historically, the gold standard was primarily ineffective because it did not respond to the flexibility of economic conditions. During the period of the gold standard, the U.S. economy experienced a recession or recessionary gap for 47 years, excluding the Great Depression. When new gold reserves were discovered, the subsequent increase in the money supply often led to inflation. For example, the California Gold Rush resulted in an inflation rate of 40%, which demonstrates the inflexibility of the gold standard in managing economic fluctuations.

Counterproductive Attempts and Costly Measures

The logistical challenges of transitioning to a gold standard today are significant. Trading gold between countries is complicated, and storing gold at banks for depositors is both expensive and time-consuming. These inefficiencies make the concept impractical in today's economic landscape.

The decision to remove the United States from the gold standard by President Nixon was driven by the massive amount of dollars held by foreign nations. If those dollars had been exchanged for gold, the U.S. would have depleted its reserves, leading to a worthless dollar. Such risks underscore the impracticality of returning to the gold standard today.

Even if one were to contend that goods cannot be counterfeited, this is not a compelling reason to revert to a commodity-based money supply. The world has moved beyond the need for such rigid systems. The inefficiency and potential economic downturn it would cause make it unsound to revert to the gold standard.

In conclusion, the gold standard, while historically significant, is not a viable option in today's complex and rapidly evolving economic environment. Central banks and governments need the flexibility to adjust monetary policies to better respond to economic conditions.