The Impossibility of American Membership in the British Commonwealth
The idea of the United States joining the British Commonwealth has been a topic of discussion since the American Revolution but it has never materialized. Having a boil lanced on one of my testicles would be preferable to having to share my country with the Americans.
Despite discussions of closer ties with Britain and the Commonwealth in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, these sentiments were often overshadowed by strong nationalist feelings and the desire to maintain independence from British influence. During and after World War II, there were discussions about potential political and economic alliances, but these did not lead to formal considerations of Commonwealth membership. The U.S. has since maintained a unique relationship with the Commonwealth characterized by cooperation and shared values without formal membership.
While there have been moments of interest in closer ties, the U.S. has consistently opted to remain an independent nation rather than join the British Commonwealth. As Joe Biden and Michael Martin meet every few weeks to discuss this issue, both agreeing it would be a bad idea, it is clear that the notion of American membership is not seen favorably by either side.
Historical Context and National Sentiments
Probably at the start of our history, some favored closer ties with Britain and the Commonwealth. However, as a nation emerged, these initial sentiments were replaced by a strong desire for independence. Today, no American wants to join the British Commonwealth. At the start of our history, the 13 colonies might have had favorable feelings, but subsequent treaties and agreements solidified American sovereignty.
Ireland and Commonwealth Membership
Ireland has observer status in the Commonwealth but it is not a full member. This status exists due to its republican status following its departure from the British Commonwealth in 1949 when it left because the rule required all members to have the Queen as the Head of State. This rule has since been changed, allowing for the possibility of Irish re-entry into the Commonwealth. However, there has never been significant support for this idea, as Ireland has not shown interest in rejoining.
While the idea of the U.S. joining the Commonwealth has been suggested, it seems unlikely to have gained substantial traction. The importance of American independence and the desire to maintain a distinct national identity continue to be primary factors.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Has Ireland ever expressed interest in rejoining the Commonwealth?
A: No. Ireland has observer status in the Commonwealth but has not shown interest in rejoining. The country left the British Commonwealth in 1949 because of the rule requiring the Queen as the Head of State, and it is unlikely to rejoin given its current republic status.
Q: Have U.S. officials discussed the possibility of American Commonwealth membership?
A: Yes, the possibility has been discussed. However, these discussions have not led to formal considerations due to the strong desire for American independence and unique relationship with the Commonwealth rather than formal membership.
Q: Why is the notion of American membership in the Commonwealth considered unfavorable?
A: The notion is unfavorable due to the strong sense of American nationalism and the desire to maintain a unique identity and independence from British influence. The U.S. prefers to maintain a cooperative relationship with the Commonwealth without formal membership.
Conclusion
While the British Commonwealth has experienced changes in membership and status over the years, the possibility of the United States joining remains inconceivable. The U.S. has consistently chosen to maintain its sovereignty and independence, ensuring its unique relationship with the Commonwealth without formal membership.
The discussions around re-entry of Ireland into the Commonwealth and the occasional suggestions for U.S. Commonwealth membership highlight the ever-evolving nature of the organization but do not change the fundamental stance of the U.S. on its sovereignty.