The G Fargo of Modi: Why Does Nirmala Sitharaman Persistently Criticize Former Leaders Instead of Focusing on Economic Development?

India, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has seen significant changes in various sectors, especially in rural connectivity, electrification, gas connections, and direct benefit transfer schemes. The focus on infrastructure has been accompanied by initiatives like promoting toilets and medical insurance, addressing the long-neglected needs of the poorest of the poor. However, the continuous criticism of former leaders such as Manmohan Singh and Raghuram Rajan by Nirmala Sitharaman highlights a broader issue within the government's approach to economic development.

Context and Background

Under the previous government led by Manmohan Singh and Raghuram Rajan, significant economic strides were made, particularly in terms of GDP growth and improving the financial situation of the middle and upper classes. However, the Modi government has taken a different approach, emphasizing the needs of the marginalized and excluded sections of society. Its efforts have included initiatives like direct benefit transfers, free electricity, and enhanced rural connectivity, which have benefitted millions of people who were previously ignored or systematically denied such opportunities.

A Deeper Look at the Criticism

Nirmala Sitharaman's persistent criticism of Manmohan Singh and Raghuram Rajan is not merely a matter of personal or political vendetta. It reflects a broader shift in the government's priorities. The criticism often centers on the period during the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government, when economic growth was primarily focused on the upper classes and middle classes. In contrast, the current government aims to address the immediate needs and challenges faced by the poorest, ensuring that they benefit from development initiatives.

The Argument Against GDP Growth Alone

In many development circles, there is a growing recognition that GDP growth alone does not equate to true economic progress. The disparity between the rich and the poor in India has continued to grow, with a significant portion of the population being left behind in the economic boom. Nirmala Sitharaman's criticism can be seen as a reflection of this concern, given that the bulk of economic growth under previous administrations benefited select segments of society, rather than the broader populace.

Current Efforts and Future Prospects

The Modi government's focus on inclusive development is evident in its new schemes and policies. Initiatives like housing for all and universal access to drinking water are aimed at reducing poverty and improving the quality of life for the marginalized sections of society. By providing services that were once the privilege of the elite, the government hopes to create a more equitable society. This shift towards inclusive growth is expected to lead to a more sustainable and widespread economic upliftment in the long run.

Conclusion

While it is natural for a leader to critique the shortcomings of previous administrations, the persistence of such criticism introduces an element of distraction from the more pressing and critical issues at hand. Instead of dwelling on the past, the Modi government should direct its efforts towards addressing the immediate economic and social challenges faced by the Indian populace. By focusing on inclusive growth and ensuring that no segment of society is left behind, the government can achieve a more balanced and sustainable development trajectory.

The real challenge lies in ensuring that these initiatives translate into tangible benefits for all Indians, particularly the poorest. As the government progresses, it must continually assess the impact of its policies and make necessary adjustments to ensure that economic growth is inclusive and sustainable.