The Financial Gilded Cage: How Much Will Be Raised for Trump's 2017 Inauguration Celebrations?

As the dust settles on a tumultuous election, the anticipation for Trump's 2017 Inauguration: ceremonies and festivities has ignited a heated debate. Will the event be a lavish celebration filled with glittering merchandise and tickets priced out of sight? Or, will it reflect the collective sentiments of those who are wary of a leader who many see as divisive and insensitive?

The scramble for funds has already begun, with private entities and perhaps even government agencies exploring potential donor outlets. However, the Donald Trump fundraising strategy remains a source of concern for those who question the appropriateness of state resources being used for what some perceive as a commercial enterprise.

Merchandise and Branding: Exploiting the Inauguration Boom

The most glaring concern for many is the planned merchandise campaign for Trump. The proliferation of Trump-themed merchandise suggests a high-profit venture, reminiscent of similar political campaigns where partisan memorabilia is sold to rally supporters and raise funds. While merchandise has long been a staple of political campaigns, the scale and commercialization of these items during official political events like an inauguration are less common and potentially problematic.

The enthusiasm for Trump's inaugural merchandise, consisting of everything from coffee mugs and t-shirts to limited-edition souvenirs, has raised eyebrows. Critics argue that such an abundance of branded items could overshadow the solemnity of the event and exploit the public's support for financial gain.

Tickets and Exclusive Access

Alongside the merchandise, the inaugural events themselves raise significant ethical questions. High-priced tickets for these events, which could include special gatherings, banquet dinners, and celebrity performances, are set to be offered. Such exclusivity not only excludes a majority of the public but also raises fears of creating a gilded cage for the wealthy and well-connected.

The cost of tickets can range from several hundred to thousands of dollars, which, for many, is beyond their means. This pricing strategy risks alienating a broader audience and reinforcing the perception that the inauguration is a privileged affair rather than a democratic event worthy of public engagement and celebration.

The Controversial Financial Landscape

The financial landscape for Donald Trump's inauguration events is complex and fraught with ethical dilemmas. The fundraising efforts and the commercial exploitation of the event have sparked conversations about the role of private and public funds in such solemn state ceremonies.

Many are arguing that public funds should not be used to support an event that could be seen as a self-serving promotion. This concern is fueled by the idea that the president-elect should be carefully treading a line between his duties as a private citizen and those as a public leader.

Would You Donate?

When asked about his stance on donating to the inauguration yourself, it appears the sentiment is overwhelmingly negative. Not one cent from supporters who view the event with deep skepticism is expected. The sheer scale of the merchandise and the high cost of tickets epitomize the commercialization of a political event, raising troubling questions about the true nature of the celebrations and the values they represent.

The Sting of the Sheep

There is a saying among those passionate about the cause that the trump sheep (referred to as supporters) will be “shorn.” Much like in the days of physical sheep, where shearing occurs to maintain hygiene and health, some may argue that the supporters are being stripped of their trust and financial support due to the perceived over-commercialization of the event. This metaphor highlights the potential disillusionment among Trump supporters who feel they are being exploited rather than genuinely represented.

Should We Pay to Celebrate? The Ethical Dilemmas

The ethical considerations surrounding Donald Trump's inaugural events raise critical questions about the value of public funds and the integrity of the democratic process. While the fervor of support among some remains unaltered, the commercialization and high costs could serve to alienate a wide swath of the population, potentially undermining the purpose of an inauguration as a unifying event.

As we approach the 2017 inauguration, the financial gilded cage looms large. Will the event be a reflection of the people or a mere tool for financial gain? The answers to these questions will not only shape the reputation of the outgoing president but also influence the public perception of the incoming one.