Libertarian Ethics and the Moral Obligation to End Slavery Globally

Historical and contemporary debates about the role of libertarians in advocating for the eradication of slavery often center around the principles of individual freedom and economic liberty. Advocates of libertarianism argue for minimal government intervention in personal and economic affairs, while still upholding the moral obligation to promote freedom and justice. This article explores the role of libertarian ethics in the fight against global slavery, questioning whether active participation is a necessary moral duty or if abstinence alone is sufficient.

Historical Context and Advocacy

In the past, libertarians have taken different stances on the issue of slavery. As mentioned, some radicals even advocated for extreme measures, such as killing slavers, while others defended the system. However, the question remains today: according to libertarian ethics, should we have a moral obligation to actively participate in ending slavery, or is our sole responsibility to abstain from owning slaves and purchasing goods from those who practice it?

Libertarian Ethics and Profit Maximization

From a purely economic perspective, libertarianism focuses on maximizing profits under the law. The argument is often made that as long as slavery remains legal, libertarians should seek to maximize profits by utilizing the labor of those enslaved. This stance was famously articulated by former US President Bill Clinton, who stated that slavery was legal, implying that it could be exploited for profit without moral obligations.

Moral Duty and Advocacy

However, distinguishing between libertarian ethics and libertarian advocacy reveals a more nuanced perspective. While a libertarian may not have a moral obligation to actively participate in ending slavery, they are often very vocal about social issues. This advocacy can be seen as a form of moral duty to speak up against injustices, regardless of the legal status of such practices. Libertarians typically find common ground with others in their advocacy efforts, even if they do not have a contractual relationship or privity of contract.

The Role of Socialism in Promoting Slavery

Contrasting libertarian and socialist views can provide further insight. Some argue that socialism historically promoted slavery, as exemplified by George Fitzhugh’s assertion that "Slavery is the very best form of socialism." Socialist systems often attempt to control labor and resources, making it difficult for individuals to escape or work free of oppression. In this context, advocates for liberty see slavery as a grave violation of individual freedom and autonomy.

Challenges and Concerns

While libertarians may advocate against slavery, they face significant challenges in their efforts. Contemporary arguments about moral responsibility highlight the complex interplay between economic interests and ethical obligations. Balancing the pursuit of profit with a commitment to human rights is a delicate balance that many libertarians struggle to maintain.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the question of whether libertarians have a moral obligation to actively participate in ending slavery hinges on a broader understanding of ethical principles and social responsibility. While libertarian ethics prioritize individual freedoms and economic liberty, the broader community of libertarians often exemplifies a commitment to promoting justice and human rights through advocacy.

Keywords: Libertarian ethics, slavery, advocacy, moral obligation, freedom, justice, anti-slavery, economics, personal responsibility, social responsibility, privity of contract.