Is Nirmala Sitharaman the Worst Finance Minister? Should She Resign?

In recent discussions, Nirmala Sitharaman has faced criticism for her performance as the Finance Minister of India, with some voices suggesting she should resign immediately due to her failure to prevent an economic slowdown. However, a closer look at her role and historical context reveals a more nuanced picture.

Deflector of Criticism

Many have unfairly labeled Sitharaman as a 'horrible finance minister,' forgetting that she serves a crucial role. As a ldquo;lightning rodrdquo; for criticism, she allows the focus to remain on her rather than on the policymakers and officials at the highest levels who make the decisions that shape the budget. This dynamic has been evident throughout history, as illustrated by the example of Andrei Gromyko, the long-serving Foreign Minister of the Soviet Union.

A Lightning Rod for Criticism

Andrei Gromyko, during his tenure, was known for deflecting criticism from the real architects of foreign policy. His famous introduction by Nikita Krushchev to a visiting dignitary, 'That is Gromyko, my foreign minister,' illustrated how he acted as a buffer. Krushchev’s statement, 'If I tell him to pull down his pants and sit on a block of ice, he will do it,' highlighted Gromyko's role in absorbing the blame.

Similarly, Nirmala Sitharaman plays a significant role in deflecting criticism. While she faces public scrutiny, it is the higher echelons of power who ultimately make the critical economic decisions. Sitharaman's willingness to implement unpopular measures while taking the brunt of the criticism ensures that the political discourse remains within the realms of her tenure and performance, distracting from the real issues.

Historical Analogies

There are historical precedents for such roles. Gromyko's ability to survive under the exigencies of the Soviet regime and deflect criticism carries important lessons for modern leadership. Likewise, Sitharaman's tenure in the BJP government mirrors similar dynamics.

Ms. Sitharaman's unwillingness to step down despite the criticisms is indicative of a fundamental strategy. By remaining in a position of responsibility, she continues to be a ldquo;rubber stamprdquo; for the BJP. When policies fail, the blame falls on her, but the political benefits of having a responsible finance minister are undeniable for the BJP.

Political Strategy and Visibility

The BJP's strategy in keeping Sitharaman in her position is carefully calibrated. The public is polarized in their views towards her, with some praising her while others criticize her actions. This divide serves the party well, as it ensures a steady public presence without the need for strong oratory skills or great economic foresight. The BJP does not require her as a unifying figure within the party, nor does she have a track record that could rally support for a challenge to Amit Shah or Narendra Modi.

Moreover, Sitharaman’s ability to hold a crucial portfolio without attracting undue attention to herself makes her an ideal choice for the BJP. Her failure or success is absorbed by her, allowing the party to proceed with its plans without distraction.

Conclusion

While Nirmala Sitharaman faces significant criticism, her role as a ldquo;lightning rodrdquo; and ldquo;rubber stamprdquo; for the BJP is a strategic move. She may not be a fool, but her position is designed to serve a specific purpose. Whether this is the right approach or not is a matter for political discourse and debate. However, it is clear that removing her from her position immediately would not address the underlying issues and could destabilize the political landscape further.

For now, Sitharaman continues to manage her role with the focus primarily on her rather than the broader economic and political implications. As the economy evolves and political climates change, her role and the impact of her decisions will continue to be under scrutiny.