Is Iran Really Involved in the US Embassy Invasion in Iraq?

Recent events have sparked intense debate regarding Iran's alleged involvement in the attack on the US embassy in Baghdad. The claims that Iran-backed Iraqi Shia militiamen were responsible have fueled controversy, with some questioning the extent of Iran's influence and control over these groups.

Iran's Denial and Acknowledgement

The group that attacked the US embassy in Iraq chanted Iranian slogans, which initially suggested a direct involvement by Iran. However, serious discrepancies remain. Our embassy was attacked by Iraqi Shia militiamen who are backed by Iran, and this fact is widely accepted. Iran, however, has neither denied nor confirmed any involvement despite confrontations and accusations.

No Evidence of Invasion or Control

The notion of an 'invasion' is a misinterpretation. The attack was carried out by groups primarily angry at the USA but friendly to Iran. These militias, though aligned with Iran, are not under direct control by the Iranian government, similar to how the USA doesn't have full control over Al Qaeda, despite arming them at times.

It is crucial to evaluate the evidence objectively. Up to this point, no concrete evidence has been presented to substantiate claims of Iranian involvement beyond their vocal support and associates. Technical intercepts and statements from captured individuals who admitted involvement do not constitute unequivocal proof of Iran's direct role.

Accusations Based on Association

There is a growing argument that labeling others as guilty based on their association with those who may be involved is fallacious. Just as approving actions from a political leader of another country does not automatically make one responsible for said actions, Iran should not be held accountable for the actions of pro-Iranian groups without direct evidence of its control or involvement.

Inciting further controversy is the discovery that the mob assaulting the US embassy chanted, "Soleimani is my commander," and even painted it on the walls. This directly linked the attack to Iran through its relationship with the deceased military leader, Qasem Soleimani, rather than any coordinated action by the Iranian government. While such evidence exists, it remains unverified by official channels.

Conclusion:

The question of Iran's involvement in the attack on the US embassy remains a subject of debate. While some evidence may link the attack to Iranian-backed groups, direct and undeniable proof of Iran's control or involvement is lacking. It is vital to ensure that accusations are based on solid evidence rather than mere association and rumor.

Key Points To Consider

No conclusive evidence of Iranian control or direct involvement has been presented. The attackers were primarily Iraqi Shia militiamen with loose ties to Iran. Chants and symbols may associate the attack more with Iran but not prove direct control. Accusations should be scrutinized and based on verifiable facts.

Conclusion

While it is clear that Iran's influence extends to some Iraqi groups, labeling the attack as an "invasion" or directly attributing it to Iran without concrete evidence is misleading and likely to further complicate international relations without substantive justification.