Should India Declare Narendra Modi as the Father of the Nation?

A father has a lot of responsibility; however, PM Modi is more akin to a carefree flying Santa who is more concerned with votes than the nation's welfare.

Why the Concept of 'Father of the Nation' is Misplaced in India

India is a diverse nation with a rich 5000-year-old history and cultural heritage. The concept of 'father of the nation' is not a suitable title for any single individual, especially when it comes to a democratic country with a constitutionally recognized system.

The term 'father of the nation' has been a subject of debate, humor, and criticism. For instance, Gandhi, a widely respected leader, was never given an official title as the 'father of the nation' in any constitutional document. It's important to understand that the title is not only a matter of honor but also a matter of respect for the nation's long-standing tradition and history.

Subhash Chandra Bose, another respected leader, even referred to his son as 'the Nation' at one of his parties, demonstrating the manner in which the title is taken in jest. Gandhi's son, Manilal, was dubbed 'the Nation' at parties, which further illustrates the jocular nature of the title.

The Honesty of the Nation

India is a nation with a vast history, culture, and heritage that spans over 5000 years. It has a diverse tapestry of individuals who have played significant roles in shaping the nation, from the great Yodheya kings to contemporary figures like Dr. Ambedkar. No single individual can truly encapsulate the spirit and heritage of such a nation.

The True Sons and Daughters of India

India is rich in history and has had many great leaders and rulers who have contributed to its growth. Some examples include:

Yodheya kings Chandragupta Rajendra Chola Maharana Pratap Krishnadevraya Veer Lachit Guru Govind Singh Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Peshwa Bajirao Rani Durgavati Rani Laxmibai Dr. Ambedkar Veer Savarkar Bhagat Singh Azad Swami Vivekanand Swami Dayanand Saraswati

These individuals have been instrumental in shaping the nation, and their contributions are recognized and celebrated. Honoring such figures provides a broader sense of national pride and unity.

Why the Term Is Unconstitutional and Improper

India is a nation with a well-established democratic system and a constitution that recognizes the rights and responsibilities of its citizens. Naming a single individual as the 'father of the nation' can be seen as unconstitutional and improper. This is because it conflates a singular individual with the collective spirit and heritage of a nation that has endured for thousands of years.

The concept of a 'father of the nation' was popularized during a tumultuous period in India's history, such as during the partition, and it was used in a more symbolic manner. While figures like Gandhi and Nehru are revered for their contributions, it is important to acknowledge that the nation is not a singular entity but a confluence of many heroes and leaders.

Conclusion

India is a diverse and ancient civilization that has experienced the rise and fall of many rulers and leaders. It is an honor to be a son or daughter of such a nation, but the title of 'father of the nation' should not be ascribed to any single individual. Instead, India should celebrate its true sons and daughters who have contributed to its rich tapestry of history and culture.