Has Mainstream Media’s Coverage of Hillary Clinton Become Biased Over Time?
At the time of writing, in July 2023, Hillary Clinton has been out of the public eye for over six years, engaging in no political activities. The notion that the mainstream media supported her is unfounded. This obsession with the Clintons, particularly in relation to Hillary, is a waste of time and energy, given her current status as a private citizen.
Current Status of Hillary Clinton and the Media
The right-wing keeps harkening back to Hillary Clinton due to her unpopularity among the Republican base. However, with few notable accomplishments to discuss, she effectively serves as a non-factor in current political discussions. When the media covers her, it is usually in response to something noteworthy or relevant to ongoing events. The idea that her past actions should continue to dominate media coverage is outdated and baseless.
The Role of Media in Political Coverage
It is important to note that media outlets are not in the business of supporting or discouraging any individual's political aspirations. Opinion columnist and pundits often express their personal views, but the core mission of news organizations is to report factual information and maintain objectivity. They determine what "sticks" and what doesn't based on the significance of the event or the public's interest.
Historical Context and Media Bias
The media serves as a window into public and political discourse. For instance, during the Republican debates in 2016, the first question addressed Trump's past behavior towards women, which he initially tried to downplay. It wasn't until after he obtained the nomination that media coverage shifted towards this issue, in stark contrast to previous coverage of him. Similarly, weeks before the election, a recording from 2005 surfaced, and there was substantial media attention on the incident. It highlights how the media's focus can be influenced by political developments.
Another salient example involves Hillary Clinton's alleged defense of a rapist. According to the author, who is a practicing attorney, the idea of laughing about such a case is offensive, especially when considering the potential consequences. When criticized in an interview, her laughter multiple times is seen as insincere and potentially indicative of a sociopathic personality. This example, among others, demonstrates the need for individuals to conduct their own research and evaluate the consistency of public figures.
Charging Hillary Clinton with Obstruction of Justice
The author suggests that Hillary Clinton should face legal consequences for actions such as erasing emails after they were subpoenaed. She is accused of obstruction of justice, a serious charge, and should be investigated if not indicted for her actions. This reinforces the notion that the media's focus on her might be influenced by a broader narrative, designed to ensure her political advancement.
To address doubts about media bias, it's crucial to consider the larger context of political maneuvers and the strategic usage of journalism to support certain narratives. The fact that media coverage of Trump's past behavior became more pronounced after he secured the nomination indicates a form of media control or bias, depending on one's perspective. Standing by and conducting your own research is paramount to forming an informed opinion.
In conclusion, the media's handling of Hillary Clinton's past is context-dependent and often influenced by political developments. It is essential for individuals to assess the information critically and form their own informed opinions, as the allegations against Clinton are significant and demand careful scrutiny.