EU Sanctions on Russia vs US Benefits: A Damaging Economic Strategy

The European Union's sanctions on Russia have become a subject of intense debate, with many questioning whether the policy is harming the bloc more than it is Russia. While the EU has joined a global reset, aimed at transforming economies into a more socialist model, there are concerns that this strategy might be counterproductive. The European world, guided by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and aligned with the New World Order (NWO), seems to be targeting Russia as a new scapegoat for its economic troubles.

EU's Economic Reset and the Questionable Collapse

Axios, a reputable news outlet, suggests that the EU’s blind allegiance to the global reset could lead to a self-inflicted economic collapse. This transformation into a state run by WEF leaders is often criticized for promoting a communist dictatorship, which could undermine the very foundations of democratic governance and free market principles.

Russia’s Reaction and Economic Turmoil

Russia's response to sanctions has been more drastic than expected. The country went into a pre-crash mode in the 1970s, reminiscent of a third-world nation. This scenario poses significant questions about Russia's corporate and fiscal responsibility. Over a short period, Russia was hit hard with the need to address its wars and global geopolitics at the expense of its citizens.

Impact on the Russian Economy

The sanctions have slightly increased prices in the European and North American markets. For Russia, however, the impact is devastating. The billionaire president and the Kremlin's mouthpiece have claimed Russia is weathering the storm, but the reality is quite different. Foreign investment has drastically decreased, and the Ruble has lost 50% of its value in recent months, plummeting to less than a penny for a single Ruble. Retired Russians and those who saved money over years find themselves financially destitute overnight. Putin's control over the media and his crackdown on dissent are further evidence of a turbulent time for the Russian populace.

The US and Russia: A Strange Contrast

While the world acts against Russia, the United States seems to benefit from a strategy that targets Putin’s regime. The US, often seen as the global superpower, appears to be gaining leverage in a geopolitical chess game. This asymmetry raises questions about the strategic decisions being made and their long-term impact on global diplomatic relations.

The End Game for Russia

As sanctions intensify, Russia finds itself in a dire situation. The military’s poor performance has led to a significant loss of public trust, forcing Putin to silence the media and imprison critics. The last vestiges of economic stability in Russia lie in natural gas sales, which the EU and US are planning to sanction. This move could devastate the Russian economy, pushing it towards a hunter-gatherer society.

Putin's Financial Position and Future Concerns

With 630 billion hidden assets spread worldwide, Russia’s economy was poised for a recovery. However, half of these funds have been sanctioned, leaving Putin with about 315 billion. This sum is insufficient for a prolonged military conflict, especially given the global pursuit of the Kremlin's enemies with more resources than Russia’s total GDP. Putin now has two choices: a negotiated exit that saves face or an extended confrontation with dire consequences. The latter could lead to his downfall and the collapse of the Russian state.

Conclusion

The EU's sanctions on Russia, while aimed at curbing aggressive actions, might be counterproductive in the long run. Instead, it risks curtailing the lives of ordinary Russians and undermining the benefits that might otherwise be gained. As the US benefits from the situation, the world should consider a more balanced approach that promotes stability and dialogue rather than unilateral measures that may prove to be detrimental. The geopolitical chess game might have moved the pieces in unexpected ways, with unforeseen consequences for all.