Can the US Senate Independently Increase the Debt Limit Without the House of Representatives?

The United States Constitution has specific requirements for the legislative process of funding, specifying that all funding legislation must originate in the House of Representatives. This article explores the limitations and possibilities when it comes to the US Senate's role in changing the debt limit without the consent of the House.

Constitutional Relevance and House Primacy

According to the Constitution, all funding legislation must start in the House of Representatives. This principle is enshrined in the historical reasoning and design of the government. The founders intended for the House of Representatives to handle money matters due to its direct connection to the people.

Historical Context and Practical Implications

Every time the debt limit is increased, the dollar’s value is affected, leading to a decrease in purchasing power for the American people. This historical fact underlines the importance of the House's role in money matters. Despite the necessity of increasing the debt ceiling, it is understood that this primarily comes as a result of spending habits that have been carried out over time. Consequently, the House of Representatives is responsible for proposing and enacting such legislation.

The Plan by McCarthy

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy already has a plan in place that would raise the debt ceiling while also reintroducing fiscal responsibility into Washington D.C. This plan is bipartisan and focuses on shrinking the national debt and ensuring the nation lives within a budget in less than a decade. Even some of the most influential figures in American politics, such as Congressmen Schiff, Swalwell, and Senators Schumer and Zetterman, recognize the necessity to address this issue by cutting spending and restoring fiscal discipline.

Presidential and Supreme Court Involvement

A common suggestion is that the president can bypass the debt ceiling by declaring that the national budget takes precedence over the debt limit. However, this would not be a practical solution because the debt limit is an existing law. Only the usual legislative process can modify existing laws, though they can be struck down by the Supreme Court if found unconstitutional. The president's veto power is a critical aspect of this process.

Abolishing the Debt Limit

Some argue that the debt limit should be abolished altogether. The original purpose of the debt limit in the late 1930s was to convey to voters that the government was committed to spending control. However, in practice, it has become a disingenuous measure, given the constant run of deficits. Implementing Keynesian economics, which advocates for running a surplus in good years, would put the debt limit into a more rational context. With fiscal discipline becoming increasingly necessary, the current debt limit poses more harm than good.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the US Senate cannot independently increase the debt limit without the House of Representatives. The legislative process, as designed by the Constitution, is clear. While it is true that the president can play a significant role in addressing the debt issue, the full authority lies with Congress. Changing the debt limit is a complex process that requires the consent of both legislative bodies, and even then, the Supreme Court could step in if the legislative action is deemed unconstitutional.