Will Bernie Sanders Lead in Renewable Energy if Elected in 2020?
With the 2020 election on the horizon, many are speculating whether a Bernie Sanders presidency could position the United States as a leader in renewable energy. However, the current political landscape may make it too late for such a role to be reaped.
The 2018 Midterm Elections: A Crucial Turning Point
The key to determining our future in the renewable energy market lies in the 2018 midterm elections. With stakes as high as the direction of our environmental policies, it is crucial to understand the implications of the choices made in 2018.
Two critical outcomes will determine the trajectory of our renewable energy market leadership. The first is whether the nation is moving towards progressive policies or succumbing to the conservative narratives championed by figures like Roy Moore, who is seen as a possible candidate for Senate. Moore's potential Senate majority could derail any meaningful progress, as his focus on reducing taxes could overshadow environmental initiatives.
US Leads in Cost-Effective Renewables Despite Challenges
While the United States boasts one of the freest energy markets globally, we are already leaders in certain types of renewable energy that are cost-effective. However, it is important to consider what truly makes a country a leader in renewable energy. Initiatives like Solyndra's showed that government support can be fraught with risk, often leading to wasteful spending and economic inefficiencies.
Forcing people to pay exorbitant rates for energy under the guise of promoting renewables may seem strategic, but it often results in higher consumer prices and a less competitive market. These policies not only fail to promote innovation but also stifle the growth of the best technological solutions.
A Socialist Presidency: Not the Answer
A Bernie Sanders presidency may hinder progress in renewable energy leadership. While a sustainable environment and economic equality are important, a socialist approach risks prioritizing political connections and bureaucracy over true innovation. Pouring money into politically connected companies rather than allowing market forces to drive technological advancement may result in higher consumer prices and less effective solutions.
Additionally, it is essential to acknowledge that the definition of "renewable" is complex. While solar and wind technologies are not as sustainable as hydroelectric power in terms of constant resource replenishment, they still offer a significant and rapidly growing potential for sustainable energy. As resources become scarce, innovation will continue to propel us forward.
America's Role in the Future of Renewable Energy
Whether Bernie Sanders runs or not, the US will need to lead in the renewable energy market by 2035. Delaying action due to political affiliations could mean ceding control to other nations, particularly those which may not have the same commitment to environmental stewardship as the US once did.
If Bernie decides to run, he will need a capable vice president to support his vision and ensure a smooth transition. Simultaneously, the age of a 78-year-old president (as of 2020) paired with the uncertainties of international relations, particularly concerning the Korean Peninsula, could make for a tumultuous presidency.
The path to renewable energy leadership is fraught with challenges, but it is imperative that the US takes proactive steps. As resources become scarce and global competition intensifies, the ability to innovate and adapt will be crucial. The United States must lead the way in developing and deploying the most advanced renewable energy technologies to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.
Conclusion
The battle for renewable energy leadership is far from over. While a Bernie Sanders presidency may face significant hurdles, it is never too late to prioritize innovation and sustainability. The United States must remain at the forefront of technological advancement to ensure a secure and sustainable energy future.