Introduction

Since taking office in 2014, President Joko Widodo (commonly known as Jokowi) of Indonesia has made a number of notable decisions, some of which have brought significant positive changes to the country, while others have been criticized for their implications. This article will analyze Jokowi’s strategic decisions in two key areas: infrastructure and maritime protection, as well as his silence on socio-political issues. We will also explore his worst and best decisions in these contexts.

Infrastructure and Economic Development

Positive Decisions: Recognizing the importance of infrastructure for social and economic development, particularly in less developed regions of Indonesia, Jokowi has taken significant steps. These projects, aimed at bridging gaps and enhancing connectivity, are designed to have long-term benefits. Although the results are still unfolding, the long-term impact of these initiatives is expected to be substantial.

For example, his administration has launched large-scale infrastructure projects in East Indonesia, aimed at improving access to basic services and promoting economic activities. These projects are expected to transform these regions and contribute to overall national development.

Maritime Protection and National Security

Positive Decisions: Protecting Indonesia's maritime territories has been a crucial priority. Jokowi’s government has demonstrated a firm stance against illegal fishing, smuggling, and other forms of maritime exploitation. Law enforcement measures have been strengthened, and a crackdown on illegal fishing activities has led to increased security and conservation efforts in Indonesian waters.

Socio-Political Silence and National Unity

Negative Decisions: One of Jokowi’s most criticized aspects is his silence on important socio-political issues. While the political climate in Indonesia requires careful handling, his silence on critical issues such as the imprisonment of Ahok, the attacks by FPI ( paramilitary organization), and the manipulation of religion by PKS (Indonesian Islamic Defender's Front) has drawn significant criticism.

Specifically, his inaction on calls to address hate speech, religious tensions, and political misconduct is notable. For instance, Jokowi has been criticized for not publicly condemning individuals who misuse religion for political gain or fomenting hatred against minority groups. His response to the Surabaya attacks, although laudable in terms of visiting the injured, did not fully address the underlying issues of national unity and inclusivity.

Worst Decisions

Worst Decision 1: Free Visa Program

One of the most notable negative decisions is the free visa program introduced in 2015. This policy, aimed at boosting tourism, was poorly prepared and lacked proper monitoring. It resulted in a lack of control over who entered and exited the country. There is a significant risk that these visitors could engage in illegal activities such as internet scams, drug trafficking, and other criminal activities, leading to serious security concerns.

Worst Decision 2: Supervision of Farmers by Soldiers

Another problematic decision was the involvement of soldiers in supervising farmers, which has raised concerns about the militarization of rural areas and the potential for human rights abuses.

Worst Decision 3: Over-Injection of Aksi Bela Negara (ABN)

ABN, a program aimed at national defense, was aggressively integrated into regular schools, leading to concerns about the militarization of education and potential indoctrination of youth.

Worst Decision 4: Quick-Start Commendations

Jokowi’s statement of “I will smash the PKI” (Indonesian Communist Party) was seen as a divisive and potentially inflammatory statement, aimed at convincing people of his anti-communist stance rather than addressing the underlying political issue.

Best Decisions

Best Decision 1: Additional Idul Fitri Holiday

One of the most popular and well-executed decisions was the extension of the Idul Fitri holiday, allowing people more time to celebrate and strengthen family bonds during the religious festival. This decision reflects Jokowi’s people-centric approach and his acknowledgment of the cultural and social significance of religious holidays.

Conclusion

While Jokowi has made commendable strides in infrastructure and maritime protection, his silence on critical socio-political issues and certain poor decisions have raised concerns. However, his comprehensive views on national development and his focus on enhancing the livelihoods of Indonesians are commendable. As he continues to lead the country, the balance between strategic decisions and public engagement will remain crucial for national stability and progress.